Evaluation Rubric:
1.   CASE STUDY                        
|       LEVEL 4 |        LEVEL 3 |         LEVEL 2 |      LEVEL 1 | |
| Context and Background   Information | The   episode is clearly situated with the appropriate details e.g. grade level,   subject being taught etc. | The   episode is situated with most of the appropriate details | The   episode has few of the appropriate details | No   context or background information | 
| Content | Incidents   are interesting and realistically portrayed | Incidents   are interesting but not realistically portrayed | Incidents   are realistically portrayed but not interesting. | Incidents   are neither interesting, nor realistically portrayed. | 
| Writing Skills | Writing   is totally free of errors Report   of the episode is very concise |   There are occasional errors. Report   could be tightened a little | There   are more than occasional errors  Report could be tightened quite a lot |  Errors are frequent   Report   of the episode is extremely long-winded. | 
| Format | Format   is appropriate and enhances the understanding of the critical episode in a   creative and dramatic manner throughout the case | Format   is appropriate and enhances the understanding of the critical episode in   dramatic manner for most the case | Format   is appropriate and enhances the understanding of the critical episode some of   the time | Format   is appropriate but seldom enhances the understanding of the critical episode | 
2.   PRESENTATION
|       LEVEL 4 |      LEVEL 3 |       LEVEL 2 |      LEVEL 1 | ||
| Delivery and Enthusiasm | Very   clear and concise flow of ideas. Demonstrates   passionate interest in the topic and engagement with the class.  | Clear   flow of ideas Demonstrates   interest in topic and engagement with the class. | Most   ideas flow but focus is lost at times Limited   evidence of interest in and engagement with the topic  | Hard   to follow the flow of ideas.  Lack   of enthusiasm and interest. | |
| Visuals | Visuals   augmented and extended  comprehension   of the issues in unique ways | Use   of visuals related to the material | Limited   use of visuals loosely related to the material | No   use of visuals.   | |
| Staging | Uses   stage effects, such as props, costumes, sound effects, in a unique and dramatic   manner that enhances the understanding of the issues in the case study | Uses   stage effects, such as props, costumes, sound effects, in an effective manner   to extend understanding of the issues in the case study | Limited   use of stage effects, and/or used in a manner that did not enhance the   understanding of the issues in the case study. | No   use of stage effects  | |
| Involvement of the class:  -Questions -Generating discussion -Activities | Excellent   and salient discussion points that elucidated material to develop deep   understanding Appropriate   and imaginative activities used to extend understanding in a creative manner | Questions   and discussion addressed important information that developed understanding Appropriate   activities used to clarify understanding | Questions   and discussion addressed surface features of the topic  Limited   use of activities to clarify understanding |  Little or no attempt to engage the class in   learning | |
| Response to Class Queries | Excellent   response to student comments and discussion with appropriate content   supported by theory/research  | Good   response to class questions and discussion with some connection made to   theory/research  | Satisfactory   response to class questions and discussion with limited reference to theory   and research | Limited   response to questions and discussion with no reference to theory/research | |
Source :www.winona.edu/air/resourcelinks/group%20case%20study.doc
 
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น